By Amy Nelson
Did you know that mandating vaccines is a blatant violation of the Nuremberg Code? Here is why:
The Covid-19 vaccine is considered
‘experimental’
Per the US National Library of Medicine, the vaccine is experimental and NOT FDA approved. Anyone having the vaccine trials is taking part in an experiment (see Clinicaltrials.gov). Our legal system, specifically the Nuremberg Code/Law, enshrines the individual’s right to voluntary, informed consent to medical risk taking as a foundational medical ethic. In summary,
-The consent must be informed
-The consent must be given voluntarily
-The consent must not be obtained through misrepresentation or fraud
Additionally, the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights; Article 6 requires consent and a thorough understanding of the ingredients in the vaccines.
“Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be expressed and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.”
For members of an organization who feel compelled to take the vaccine as a condition of employment or attendance, as a matter of justice, the question of compensation for injury must be considered. It would behoove organizations incentivizing vaccines which carry risks, to have a robust compensation program in place.
Vaccine hesitancy is a direct result of the lack of acknowledgement by the pharmaceutical industry, government regulatory agencies and health professionals of many of our concerns–legal, religious, scientific and philosophical. Instead of increasing vaccine hesitancy by messaging the move toward requiring vaccination, organizations are encouraged to take up this challenge and address the concerns of a growing portion of the population who are losing trust in the system.
We need robust debate, bringing in experts from many backgrounds. As we move toward the vaccination of children and a push toward more governmental overreach and control of the populace, this becomes imperative.
It is my opinion that mandating masks is also a direct violation of The Nuremberg Code. “Just following orders” was not legally defensible during the Nuremberg trials.
Amy Nelson is a resident of Winnemucca.
The Nuremberg Code
The Nuremberg Code arose as part of the trial of the United States v. Karl Brandt. Karl Brandt and others were tried at Nuremburg for crimes against humanity committed in their roles as the Nazi high command. The code has ten requirements:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent: to be able to exercise free power of choice without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
No experiment should be conducted where there is a prior reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur, except perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subject.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation seems to him to be impossible.
During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
